![]() On March 27, 1996, Respondent had emergency repairs made to the roof of the Highland Hills Post Office at a cost of $900.00 (AF B16, D1, D2). ![]() (Declaration of Arthur Jimenez Declaration of Robert Belden).ġ0. Nevertheless, as of March 27, 1996, no roof repair or replacement work had been accomplished. In these conversations, Appellant repeatedly assured Respondent that he would soon award a contract to have the post office roof replaced. ![]() In addition to the letters and facsimiles sent to Appellant, the contracting officer had numerous telephone conversations with Appellant during this same time period. Similar warnings were issued to Appellant by facsimile on March 7, and by letter on Ma(AF B9, B10).ĩ. In two facsimiles, sent on March 6, 1996, the contracting officer again demanded that, unless Appellant acted immediately to repair the roof, Respondent would make its own arrangements to have the roof repaired to correct a significant safety hazard (AF B5, B6). Appellant was advised that Respondent’s cost to repair the roof, plus administrative costs, would be charged to Appellant and deducted from rental payments owed. Appellant was requested to repair the roof that same day and warned that if it did not do so, Respondent would have no choice but to make its own arrangements to have the roof repaired to insure the safety of its customers and employees. By letter dated March 5, 1996, the contracting officer again informed Appellant that the roof continued to leak, causing wet and slippery floors which constituted a significant safety hazard for the customers and employees of the post office. On March 1, 1996, Appellant notified Respondent’s contracting officer that a roofing contractor would send someone to the post office “as soon as possible” and to advise him if no one showed up. Appellant was requested to immediately arrange for roof repairs to take place no later than the following day. By letter dated February 29, 1996, Respondent’s contracting officer notified Appellant that the roof on the Highland Hills Post Office was leaking and that the situation was urgent. (Declarations of Charles Juarez, Robert Belden, Arthur Jimenez, Kathy Davis AF B2).ĥ. By February 1996, the roof leaked in six different locations whenever it rained. The roof on the Highland Hills Post Office is approximately 37 years old. In accordance with Paragraph (c)(2) of the Maintenance Rider to the lease, the lessor is responsible for all structural repairs to the demised premises, including all parts of the roof system (AF A1).Ĥ. Appellant purchased the property in 1992 (AF A3 Declaration of Arthur Jimenez).ģ. The lease contained two five-year options, which have been exercised. Respondent leased the Highland Hills Post Office, San Antonio, Texas from Appellant’s predecessor-in-interest for an initial term beginning on Jand ending June 30, 1991. Only entitlement is at issue in this appeal.ġ. The parties have elected to submit their cases on the record in accordance with 39 C.F.R. ![]() No one forced you to work there, so if you don't like it, I'm sure they're are other employment opportunities that will fit you better.Appellant, Nationwide Postal Management, has appealed the decision of the contracting officer denying its claim for $1,100 for alleged improper deductions from rent owed by Respondent, United States Postal Service, to Appellant. So lady with the side shaved head and short Hispanic lady please work on your attitude and they way you speak to customers. ![]() Needless to say, I won't be going to do business there again and i don't recommend people do priority services there because like they said me "it's not guaranteed ", so you will be paying for a service you might not get with no refunds. So after explaining to the situation to lady with the side of her head shaved and asked for the partial refund, she answers with "I don't know about all that", like I was the one at fault. So I stopped by because I felt I deserved a partial refund for the services I paid for, which they failed to do. Well, USPS failed to deliver the package on time and it arrived on the 6th day. This package was for a customer whom I told, I would have it delivered early cause of his quick payment (2 days). A week ago I had a package delivered by them by Priority Mail I believe which is $19.95 two day shipping instead of 6 day shipping which is like half of that or less I believe. I go to this spot cause its near my home but recently (today, 25th of November) I had a bad experience and its not the first time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |